Just happened to see a link over on the lampmode forum that someone was pointing out could be a possible place for evangelism – an article by the Infidel Guy.
Pretty long article.
He did a lot of commentary on the problem of evil and why would a good God allow suffering, why is all humanity paying for Adam and Eve’s sin, etc…. you know…. stuff that was answered in detail twenty centuries ago by first and second century apologists.
Of course, it’s easy to attack with lame arguments when you haven’t realized that those arguments have already been answered.
Anyway….I registered, thinking I could simply post comments for free.
You need to be a GOLD (read: paying) member of his site to comment.
Psalm 14:1 says that the FOOL has said in his heart “there is no God.”
Only a fool would spend that much time typing up an article against someone he says doesn’t exist……
If God doesn’t exist, why should it matter that you try to talk me out of my belief in God ? (not to mention you’re making the mistake of thinking that Christianity is strictly a function of mind in the first place….)
Further, what’s your basis for defining ‘good’ ? Oh… I forgot, in order to have any ultimate meaning for ‘good’ ‘evil’ etc…. you have to borrow furniture from my house (read: borrow concepts and ideas from the Christian worldview). Otherwise, everything is relative and two sticks hitting together is no more morally repugnant than a fist hitting a face.
And naturalism can’t account for morality….only matter, motion, time and space…. neither can ‘conscience’, since conscience only senses morality, not ‘creates morality’…..
Anyway, just passing thoughts…. hmmm… this should be a rhyme 
Renee [Visitor]
“Further, what’s your basis for defining ‘good’ ? Oh… I forgot, in order to have any ultimate meaning for ‘good’ ‘evil’ etc…. you have to borrow furniture from my house (read: borrow concepts and ideas from the Christian worldview).”
I never looked at it like that before but you are dead on with that analogy …
i have to use that …THANKS
Ron [Visitor]
“And naturalism can’t account for morality….only matter, motion, time and space…. neither can ‘conscience’, since conscience only senses morality, not ‘creates morality’…..”
Nah, they cant account for matter, motion, time and space either! They can’t account for why matter, motion, time and space have universal laws that regulate them so that they’re the same yesterday, today and tomorrow as well. Uniformity of nature is completely unaccounted for. As Bahnsen always said, their worldview doesn’t have any of the preconditions for intelligibility of the world around us…
Fred [Visitor]
I posted a parody article yesterday on the proofs for the non-existence of God. It maybe somewhat relevant.
Fred
Hip and Thigh
Redeemed [Visitor]
derived reality denies the existence of absolute reality…that’s just silly
HE’S THE REAL-EST!!