Well…. approximately 2 months ago, I wrote a bit of an observation on one Mr. Dave Armstrong. I came in from the mall this afternoon and (in usual single-man fashion) went to the computer to check my access logs for my blog so I can delete all the blogspam for real estate offers, penis enlargement offers and blogporn links that typically creep into my statistics. The first recent visitor I noticed at the top of the list was Dave’s website…. and I figured he’d finally seen the post I put up in passing about him a while back.

Well, Dave’s replied with what amounts to “but Protestant apologists are just as guilty”.

I knew it’d be just a matter of time. The internet is getting smaller every day.

Of course, I’ll be responding in time (maybe later tonight or 2morrow before I go to a cookout and go see fireworks with a friend). My day’s been pretty decent thus far and I don’t feel like opening up the rhetorical trunk-o-words to respond to Dave right this minute. Besides… I have too many other small and medium-sized fires to go stomp out nowadays…. but later.

One small thing, though (since Dave decided to use this as the subtitle for his latest blog entry). I need to make one small correction on my initial blogpost. I just caught the typo today….

I originally wrote:

Me, being a natural attention seeker, I do have a bit of an ability to spot pride – even pride shrouded in false humility (“Look at how HUMBLE and willing to dialogue I am! Look at what others say about me! My writings speak for themselves!”). Just an observation – and a right one, I think. If Dave’s unregenerate….well, that would explain a lot. If he is, but just woefully misled and misleading others into Catholicism… that would explain a lot too.

Those last two sentences should be:

If Dave’s unregenerate….well, that would explain a lot. If he is regenerate, but just woefully misled and misleading others into Catholicism… that would explain a lot too.

I apologize for any confusion this may have caused on my part.

Okay, NOW off to goof off.